*Article
scanned from original printed version – always refer to original printed
text before quoting/citation*
Trench warfare in the Gap of the North, 1600’ in Cuisle na nGael (Newry, 1987)
55
The perceptive modern day
traveller journeying South on a train from Newry to Dundalk has undoubtedly
noticed the recently erected British military installations on both sides of
the famous Gap of the North or the Moyry Pass as it will be more generally
called in this article. If one looks at the right hand side of the Pass in
particular, one would observe that the defensive works there are both of the
more recent as well as of a much earlier genre. The old Moyry Castle, in fact,
dates from 1601.1 Clearly though, even today the area in the
proximity of the Gap of the North is of considerable strategic importance. How
much more so was this the case at the turn of the seventeenth century is also
worth noting. Indeed the events immediately preceding the erection of the
Moyry Castle provide a fascinating insight into the power struggle between the
Elizabethan English and the native Irish under Hugh O'Neill, Earl of Tyrone.
By the year 1600,English efforts
to
bring the rebellious earl to heel had become successively unstuck. Moreover,
many believe that at one crucial juncture, after the Irish had defeated the
English so decisively at the Battle of the Yellow Ford in 1598, England's grip
on Ulster had become precarious, to say the least,
In the aftermath of the Yellow
Ford catastrophe, the English threw vast resources in men and money behind
Essex's expedition to Ireland in 1599 in an attempt to remedy the grievous
situation. But this effort failed miserably too, as Essex was to achieve
little or nothing of note. Following Essex's fruitless exertions, an
exasperated Elizabeth turned to Lord Mount joy, the general who was to
eventually vanquish the hitherto unbeatable Earl of Tyrone. But Mount joy's
ultimate victory was not to be achieved without one or two notable setbacks,
none more so indeed than the battles at the Moyry Pass in the autumn of 1600.
In the words of G.A. Hayes-McCoy, a military historian of the period,
"Mount joy's early encounters with the Ulstermen were far from being
glorious to the English arms".2
Soon after assuming the
viceroyalty, Mountjoy was to become persuaded of the utility of what may be
described as a garrison policy. This was designed to effect a stranglehold on
Tyrone’s northern power-base. The first demarche in this plan of action was
reflected in the establishment of Sir Henry Docwra's garrison at Derry in May
1600. At that time, in order to draw off Tyrone's attentions from Docwra's
amphibious landing, Mount joy made his first sortie through the infamous Moyry
Pass. On this occasion his forces emerged relatively unscathed as O'Neill made
little effort to intervene. The story was vastly different when Mount joy set
out from Dublin in the autumn of 1600 to travel through the Moyry on his way
to Armagh. He intended to plant another garrison there as a -further
instalment in his policy of circumvallation.3 Faced with impending
encirclement, Hugh O'Neill made a determined bid to frustrate the Deputy's
intentions. The northern earl let it be known that he would confront the
Viceroy's forces as they tried to traverse the Moyry and Mount joy confidently
rose to the challenge.4 The scene then was set for a major
56
confrontation.
It is against this background that the events in the Moyry Pass during
September and October 1600 unfolded. But, before embarking on a narration and
analysis of these incidents it would be wise to make it clear at the outset
that the extant sources on which this account is based are almost exclusively
provided by English army commanders of the time.5 Consequently, to
a greater or lesser degree, they may well have been tinged with a tendentious
nature.
Mount joy had at his disposal on
this expedition a force of some 2400 foot and 300 horse, while English
estimates Tyrone's strength as slightly greater.6 The Deputy
arrived Dundalk on the 14th September 1600. Shortly afterwards he encamped at
the hill of Faughart, adjacent to the Moyry where Tyrone held fortified
positions.7 Fynes Moryson ,who was soon to become Mount joy's
private secretary,8 recorded that the Lord Deputy resolved at the
outset "to march over
him(O'Neill),
if hee stopped his way ,and make him know ,that his Kerne could not keep the
fortification against the Queen's forces".9 But this was
easier said than done, as Mount joy soon found out to his cost both in terms
of his own reputation and in the number of casualties his army sustained in
the subsequent engagements. The Irish defences in the Pass itself consisted of
specially constructed barricades and trenches made of a combination of stones,
turf and palisades. Further up, on the densely wooded Moyry hillside, the
Irish had 'plashed' or intertwined the branches of trees together to form a
further considerable impediment to the advancing English.10 All in
all,
the formidable nature of O'Neill's defences astounded the Viceroy and his
commanders. Mount joy commented that in erecting such fortifications,'these
barbarous people had far exceeded their custom and our expectation’.11
The actual hostilities in the
Pass raged on and off between the 20th September and the 8th of October 1600,
at the end of which period Mount joy retired, or should it be said retreated,
with his forces to Castletown. Interludes in the fighting during this period
were generally ascribed
by
contemporaries to torrential rainfall. Yet, when fighting was possible, some
ferocious engagements occurred between the two sides, with some
extraordinary displays of valour being displayed by men from each army. The
trial of strength began as soon as Mount joy's army pitched its camp at
Faughart on the 20th September and a foraying party was sent into the Moyry to
procure firewood and other necessities. This resulted in a two hour long
skirmish.12 On the following day, hostilities resumed when a small
party of some 20 'rebel' cavalrymen rode to
'within
a musket shot of our camp' . Evidently, this was too much for their English
adversaries who seem to have taken this demonstration as a grave affront.
About 8 English cavalrymen immediately set forth in hot pursuit and gave chase
to the Irishmen who fled. Unfortunately, for the impetuous Englishmen, it came
too late when they realised that they had been lured into a cunning trap. One
man was killed, while another was shot off his horse having been struck in
seven places. Luckily, as the English account of this incident goes, the badly
injured man retained his presence of mind and '...feigning himself to be dead,
suffered them without resistance to strip him of his apparel; by which means
they struck not off his head, as their fashion is, but leaving him naked,
within half an hour after he returned into our camp and being now very well
recovered, is ready to requite their courtesy, when he shall find them at the
like advantage'.13
57
The next notable engagement occurred on the 25th of September, when
under cover of 'an exceeding great mist' , Mount joy sent a detachment to test
the strength of the Irish trenched.14 Obviously, the Deputy was
proceeding cautiously, preferring to gauge the type of resistance which a full
scale assault on the Pass might receive. Favoured by the element of surprise,
the initial stages of this operation went well for the English. Things soured
as they retreated however, and the foray resulted with some 12 men killed and
30 wounded on the English side. Ironically, an English account of this action
comments of these losses that 'the greatest part of which harm (as is guessed)
we received from ourselves, the grossness of the mist disabling us to
distinguish friends from foes'.15 It was at this stage that the
apparently extraordinary inclement weather, even by Irish standards,
intervened, causing a lull in the fighting for about five or six days. During
this time even Lord Deputy Mount joy's tent was blown down.16
When the hostilities eventually
resumed, they proceeded with a vengeance, as on the 2nd of October the
fiercest engagement of all was fought out in the Pass. Apparently the Irish
were slighted by the earlier English tactic of attacking under cover of mist.
Consequently, when the weather cleared by the 2nd of October the Irish began
to taunt their English opponents. According to an English chronicler, they
'reviled our men, as their manner is, calling them cowards for stealing on
them in the mist, and asking why they came not again to the trenches, where
they should find them better provided to receive them' . In the midst of the
ferocious engagements which then ensued, Mount joy had a close shave with
death as he made his way with his entourage onto a hill to observe the battle.
In the process of doing so, one of the gentlemen who was riding 'hard by' him
was mortally wounded.17 The Deputy's good fortune in escaping death
or serious injury was also shared by some of his officers. In particular, Sir
William Godolphin, in leading a cavalry charge during the battle ‘had his
horse stricken under him stark dead with a blow on the forehead, that the
blood sparkled into his face and some of the powder shot'.18
Others, however, were not so lucky. The English admitted that at least 55 of
their men were killed in the engagement and that some 105 were wounded. At he
same time they claimed that up to 400 Irish also died.19 It must
58
be
said that there is no independent verification for this estimation of Irish
casualties and consequently a degree of exaggeration may be suspected. On the
other hand, that
losses were high on
both sides may be
accepted due to the fact that
it was
generally agreed by the English_
soldiers
who took part in that day's combat that it was 'the greatest made
since the beginning of these wars'.20
The engagements on the Moyry
Pass reached their climax on that day and over the next few days they
gradually petered out. One English commentator reveals the despondency which
had by this time undoubtedly begun to pervade through the ranks of the English
army. After the events of the 2nd of October, Sir Robert Lovell, writing to
the Earl of Essex, commented on the ostensibly confident mood in the English
camp but made no secret of the fact of his own feelings of doubt. "There
is no talk but of passing the Moyerie, or lying in the mire, which I think
rather; but for myself I doubt not to live and see your lordship as happy as
ever you were".21 Unfortunately for Lovell, his premonition of
imminent death was to be fulfilled sooner than even he might have thought as
he was killed later on the same day that he penned this missive.22 By
the 8th of October, Mount joy and his English army had had enough and they
retreated to Dundalk. In the words of one of Mount joy's biographers, this
'was a tacit but definite admission of defeat on the part of the
English'.23 O'Neill's response to this move was to withdraw his own
forces from the Moyry Pass also. Hayes-McCoy attributes this decision by the
Earl of Tyrone to a combination of different factors. In the main, he believes
that O'Neill was engaged in cunning politicking. "It was quite consistent
with his conduct of the war to give the appearance of being determined to
fight to the finish and then suddenly to cease fire".24
Undoubtedly, this may have been a leading consideration, especially once Mount
joy had withdrawn from the Pass. But another explanation, not necessarily
incompatible with this one, may be just as feasible.
60
It is arguable indeed that
Tyrone was not really interested in persistently preventing the English from
advancing upon him through the Gap of the North. He well knew that it was just
as practicable for the English to come via Carlingford, or to come by sea via
Carrickfergus. Alternatively, further amphibious landings could be made, such
as that which had just been successfully negotiated at Derry. Rather the
testimony of the strength of O'Neill's preparations at the Moyry at this
particular time and the dogged Irish defence of the Pass, which even many of
the English commanders at the time acknowledged, may suggest that the Earl was
after something more grandiose. It is possible that O'Neill was playing for
higher stakes and that what he really wanted at this juncture was to inflict
another defeat on the English of the dimensions of that at the Yellow Ford in
1598. Certainly, this was not beyond the realms of possibility because the
Moyry Pass offered some of the finest natural advantages to the defending
Irish army. Significantly, the historian Lord Hamilton has noted that Tyrone
employed similar tactics at the Moyry to those which he had earlier used with
such devastating success at the Yellow Ford. On that occasion also he
constructed trenches to oppose the advancing English, though his defences on
the Moyry seem to have been more elaborate.25
Mount joy's reflections on the
perils of traversing the Gap of the North at this time are important because
they allude to the fact that he suspected what Tyrone may have been aiming at
and wisely decided against hazarding his army. During the Moyry engagements,
the Deputy said of the Pass that he was determined 'to make this way a secure
gate and passage to beat this proud rebel out of the North, which is such a
stumbling block to the army, whensoever it shall pass, that it is a great
grace of God ,if at one time or another the army be not lost, and consequently
the Kingdom; but at least both, every time we shall do anything in the North,
will be desperately ventured.26 In other words ,the Viceroy was
alive to the possibly disastrous consequences of a serious defeat at the Moyry.
What is beyond doubt is that Mount joy's tactics during the hostilities in the
Pass were characterized by judicious, and as it turned out, well-warranted
caution. His operations at that time were largely confined to a series of
probes, never once did he try to bludgeon his way through with all his forces
as well as his bag and baggage. Instead after meeting such stiff resistance he
sensibly withdrew to Castletown to take stock of the situation. Consequently,
for O'Neill there was little advantage to be gained by remaining in the Moyry
once Mount joy had declined to run his gauntlet.
O'Neill's withdrawal from the
Pass enabled the Deputy to consider again attaining the objective which he had
originally set himself on embarking from Dublin, the establishment of a
garrison at Armagh. It must be remembered that much was expected of Mount joy
by his superiors in England and that having promised that he would establish a
garrison so close to the heart of O'Neill's power-base, then he was more or
less obliged to achieve this declared goal. As a result, despite obvious
misgivings about having to leave the Moyry unfortified when he passed through
it unhindered later in October 1600, the exigencies of time and the necessity
to realise his Armagh objective left him with no choice. Instead, he had to
content himself with obliterating
O'Neill's
trenches on the Moyry and cutting down much of the forestry in the area which
provided such additional hazard.27
61
As
it transpired, however, the Deputy was also subsequently forced to temporarily
abandon his aspirations regard in Armagh. This must have come as a source of
bitter disappointment to him. Inclement weather and lack of supplies were blamed
for this setback. Mountjoy’s only consolation may have been derived from the
fact that he managed to establish a garrison at Mountnorris.28 At
least then, Tyrone's defence of the Moyry had frustrated the Viceroy's more
ambitious plans. Moreover, in making his return journey from the North, Mountjoy
was constrained into making an embarrassing detour via Carlingford to avoid
passing through the Moyry, where O'Neill had once again re-established himself.29
Instead, the English army's homeward journey took it back via Newry and then
towards Warrenpoint. On reaching the Narrow Water, the English troops were
ferried to the Fathom side and from there marched on towards Carlingford. These
manoeuvres by no means went unopposed by O'Neill's forces but at least they were
not subject to the same perils that a return journey through the Gap of the
North would have entailed.30
In the short term, it seems a
fair assumption that O'Neill had the upperhand on Mount joy during the Lord
Deputy's venture into Ulster which began in September 1600. 0f course, in many
ways this is hardly surprising given that it was often quite literally an uphill
struggle for the English who were also at the grave disadvantage of having to
assault heavily fortified positions. As one English officer explained, when they
launched attacks on the Irish trenches 'we had only their heads for our
marks they our whole bodies for their butt'.31 Nevertheless,
it remains true that despite the initial braggadocio of the English officers
involved in the Moyry operations at this time, Mount joy's army failed to break
through the Pass and it was his army which first broke off the engagements by
retreating to Castletown. What is more the Deputy suffered the further indignity
of failing to achieve his objective of planting a garrison at Armagh. He then
had to rather ignominiously take the circuitous route homewards via Carlingford.
All in all, Mount joy lost at least
200 dead and 400 wounded during his operations in Ulster at this time.32 But
there were compensatory factors for the English. If it seemed that all the short
term advantages lay
with
O'Neill, there was also another
side to the story which illustrated less auspicious omens for the Irish. After
all, Mountjoy had preserved his army by wisely avoiding the risk involved in a
foolhardy attempt to traverse the Moyry when the Irish defences there were
plainly very strong. Almost concurrently with the Moyry engagements, ,the first
fruits of the establishment of Docwra's outflanking position at Derry were
reaped when the formidable Niall Garbh O'Donnell defected with his forces to the
English there.33 Then, when the Deputy returned to the Moyry Pass
with his forces in June of the following year, 1601, he ensured that the
important task of establishing a fortification there was seen to as a matter of
priority.34 Initially, it was intended that two
defensive works should be
established, though eventually only one was erected and it still stands there
today.35 Of course, in modern times, as it was mentioned earlier, it
is noticeable that the British army has built fortifications on both sides of
the Gap of the North. One wonders, will they still be there in another 400 years
time?
1 C.J.Buckley, 'Report of
Sir Josias Bodley on some Ulster fortresses in 1608' ,in U.J.A., 2nd
series,vol.xvi,pp61-4.
2 G.A.Hayes-McCoy, 'Irish Battles', (London, 1969) p.132. Hereinafter
cited as Hayes-McCoy, 'Irish Battles'.
3 ibid,p.133.
4 A Journal of the Lord Deputy's journey into the North, 28 Oct.l600 (P.R.O.
,SP.63/207/pt.5/l22).
5 As regards Irish sources, the Annals of the Four Masters provide little
additional information on events at this time except in maintaining that
O'Neill's forces succeeded in ‘the killing of countless numbers of their
(English) gentlemen, officers, recruits, and attendants'. See A.F.M.
,vol.vi,1589-1616, pp2223-4.????????????????????????
6
'A brief journal of my Lord Deputy's second voyage into the north; 1600'
(P.R.O.
,S.P.63/207,pt.6/25); Stafford to Cecil,4
Oct.1600(P.R.O.,S.P.63/207,pt.5/79).
7 Moryson, 'Itinerary' ,vol.II,p.336.
8 Mountjoy's previous Secretary, Mr George Cranmer, was actually killed
near Carlingford as the English army journeyed back from the North at the end of
this expedition. A contemporary observed of Cranmer's death that he 'was shot in
the head and died, before the next unto him knew that he was Shot'.
See, 'A brief journal of My Lord Deputy's second voyage into the
North,1600',(P.R.O. ,S.P.63/207,pt.6/25).
9 Moryson, 'Itinerary' ,vol.II,pp336-7.
10 Hayes-McCoy, 'Irish Battles' ,pp134-6.
11 Mountjoy and some of the Council to the Privy Council,28 Oct.l600,
(P.R.O. ,S.P.63/207,pt.5/121).
12 'A journal of the Lord Deputy's journey into the North' ,28 Oct.1600,
(P.R.O. ,S.P.63/207,pt.5/122).
13 'A brief journal of My Lord Deputy's second voyage into the North,
1600' ,
(P.R.O. ,S.P.63/207,pt.6/25).
14 See note 12.
15 See note 13.
16 See note 12.
17 Ibid. Fynes Moryson .records a report that during the later
engagements near Carlingford, an English sniper 'killed the next man to Tyrone,
on whose shoulder at that time he leaned'. See 'Itinerary' ,vol.II,p341.It must
be said that this information is highly suspect as it was provided either by a
defector from the Irish camp or an Irish prisoner. There may well have been a
greater element of wishful thinking than truth in this claim, as Mount joy's
retinue was undoubtedly still somewhat shocked by their own Deputy's close shave
with death at an earlier stage.
18 See note 12.
19 See note 13.
20 ibid.
21 Lovell to Essex,5 Oct.1600(P.R.O. ,S.P.63/207,pt.5/80).
22 Cal.S.P.Ire. ,1600,p463.
23 F.M.Jones'Mountjoy 1563-1606,The ?????????Deputy' ,(Dublin,
1958),p.82.
24 Hayes-McCoy,'Irish Battles' ,p.141.
25 Lord
Ernest
Hamilton, 'Elizabethan 1919)pp.271-2.26.????????
26 Mountjoy to Carey,1O Oct.1600 (P.R.O. ,S.P.63/207,pt.5/88).
27 'A brief journal of my Lord Deputy's second voyage into the
North;1600', (P.R.O.,S.P.63/207,pt.6/25).
28 Moryson,'Itinerary' ,vol.II,pp337-9.
29 Lane to Cecil,14 Nov.1600(P.R.O.,S.P.63/207,pt.6/21).
30 Moryson, 'Itinerary' ,vol.II,pp339-342.
3l.'A brief journal of my Lord Deputy's second voyage into the North;
1600' ,
(P.R.O. ,S.P.63/207,pt.6/25).
32 Moryson, 'Itinerary' ,vol.II,p.342.
33 Hayes-McCoy,'Irish Battles' ,p.141.
34 Carey to Cecil,18 June 1601(P.R.O.,S.p.63/208,pt.3/22).
35 Lane to Cecil,14 Nov.l600(P.R.O. ,S.P.63/207,pt.6/21).
last
Elizabethan
Ulster'
,(London,